IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jsustf/v16y2026i3p804-840.html

Corporate ESG engagement and information asymmetry: the moderating role of country-level institutional differences

Author

Listed:
  • Seda Bilyay-Erdogan

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine: (i) the impact of corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on asymmetric information and (ii) whether this relationship differs for countries with different legal and governance systems. Employing an extensive sample (covering 21 countries from Europe) for an extended time frame (2002-2019), we present evidence that overall corporate ESG performance reduces information asymmetry. Moreover, environmental, social, and governance pillars separately contribute to this significant relationship. Within the ten subcategories of the ESG score, only the emissions, workforce, human rights, product responsibility, and management scores significantly and negatively affect asymmetric information. We also present novel evidence that the inverse relationship between corporate ESG performance and information asymmetry is more pronounced in civil law and stakeholder-oriented countries, but not in common law and shareholder-oriented countries. Our findings demonstrate that firms’ country-level institutional context moderates the association between ESG performance and information asymmetry.

Suggested Citation

  • Seda Bilyay-Erdogan, 2026. "Corporate ESG engagement and information asymmetry: the moderating role of country-level institutional differences," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 804-840, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:16:y:2026:i:3:p:804-840
    DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2022.2128710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20430795.2022.2128710
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20430795.2022.2128710?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:16:y:2026:i:3:p:804-840. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TSFI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.