IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jsustf/v16y2026i2p341-363.html

ESG ratings in motion: the global market response to upgrades and downgrades

Author

Listed:
  • Mikhail Vasenin
  • Savva Shanaev
  • Humnath Panta
  • Binam Ghimire

Abstract

We employ a calendar-time portfolio approach to investigate the effects of ESG rating changes on a comprehensive sample of global stocks rated by MSCI between 2017 and 2021 (2,841 stocks, including 2,100 upgrades and 813 downgrades). Rating upgrades (downgrades) result in positive (negative) abnormal returns of approximately 1% per month, both statistically and economically significant, aligning with previous studies. These effects remain robust to holding period definitions, alternative factor models and weighting schemes, and they appear relatively consistent across sectors and regions becoming more synchronised since the COVID-19 pandemic. The market is shown to partially anticipate ESG rating upgrades but not downgrades. The impact of ESG rating changes on stock returns is particularly stronger for large firms, growth firms, and those operating in countries with low power distance. Overall, these findings add to the sustainable finance literature, especially on ESG rating heterogeneity, by revealing key determinants of the ESG–financial performance relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikhail Vasenin & Savva Shanaev & Humnath Panta & Binam Ghimire, 2026. "ESG ratings in motion: the global market response to upgrades and downgrades," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 341-363, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:341-363
    DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2025.2612581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20430795.2025.2612581
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20430795.2025.2612581?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:341-363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TSFI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.