IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jsustf/v14y2024i2p327-343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A three-level analysis of values related to socially responsible retirement investments

Author

Listed:
  • John Magnus Roos
  • Magnus Jansson
  • Tommy Gärling

Abstract

The aim is to investigate the value basis of Socially Responsible Retirement Investments (SRRI) in a study of Swedish pension investors in the age range 18 to 65 years (N=1005). Logistic regression analyses were performed with self-reported SRRI choice as dependent variable and different levels of values as independent variables. On a higher level of analyses, self-transcendent values, especially universalism (e.g., equality, protecting the environment, and social justice), have the most important influences on SRRI choice. In contrast, on a lower-level analysis, SRRI choice is influenced by self-enhancement values with high priority for authoritarian power and low priority for wealth. The three-level analysis of values (self-transcendence vs self-enhancement value orientation, motivational domain, and value) questions the contradiction between dimension poles of values and the structuring of values in interrelated motivational domains. The results thereby clarify some previous findings and increase the understanding of the value basis of SRRI.

Suggested Citation

  • John Magnus Roos & Magnus Jansson & Tommy Gärling, 2024. "A three-level analysis of values related to socially responsible retirement investments," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 327-343, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:327-343
    DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2022.2077291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20430795.2022.2077291
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20430795.2022.2077291?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:327-343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TSFI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.