IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jsocen/v16y2025i3p1632-1654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Where Two Are Fighting, the Third One Does What? Digitalisation and Its Effects on Social Entrepreneurship’s Social-Economic Hybridity

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Xiao
  • Markus Beckmann

Abstract

Simultaneously pursuing social and economic value, social entrepreneurship (SE) builds on hybrid organisations that need to align competing institutional logics. But what influences this alignment? Despite digitalisation’s growing importance, there is no systematic analysis of how digitalisation influences SE’s hybridity, that is, its social and economic logic and their compatibility. To address this gap, we first operationalise SE’s digital orientation as a matter of digital depth and digital breadth. We then briefly illustrate the positive and negative effects of digitalisation on social and economic value creation. Our findings then identify nine specific forms of how digitisation can affect SE’s logic compatibility in positive, negative, and neutral ways. For future research, our discussion presents initial suggestions for measuring SE’s digital orientation, provides a Weberian ideal type definition of digital social entrepreneurship, and invites investigating the institutional implications of digitising SE.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Xiao & Markus Beckmann, 2025. "Where Two Are Fighting, the Third One Does What? Digitalisation and Its Effects on Social Entrepreneurship’s Social-Economic Hybridity," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 1632-1654, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jsocen:v:16:y:2025:i:3:p:1632-1654
    DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2024.2318375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19420676.2024.2318375
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19420676.2024.2318375?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jsocen:v:16:y:2025:i:3:p:1632-1654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJSE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.