IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jsocen/v16y2025i1p169-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gendered Disparities in Funding for Non-Profit, Hybrid, and for-Profit Start-Ups

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Compion
  • Benjamin J. Lough
  • Bok Gyo Jeong

Abstract

This study addresses a scholarship need to use more gender-conscious, structuration theory to explore the investment funding ecosystem on start-up social enterprises. The paper examines gendered disparities in start-up equity funding available to non-profit, for-profit, and hybrid social ventures, and amongst ventures with and without invention-based technologies. Analysis consists of 17,440 start-up ventures that applied to the Global Accelerator Learning Initiative (GALI) between 2013 and 2019, and quantitatively tests three hypotheses. These hypotheses suggest differences across (1) the gender composition of founder teams and venture type; (2) equity funding available by gender and across venture types; and (3) gendered differences between invention-based ventures. The findings are analysed from the lens of structuration theory, recognising both individual and structural level barriers to equity. We conclude by discussing implications for overcoming structural-based gender differences in areas such as public policy, the education system, scholarship, and professional associations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Compion & Benjamin J. Lough & Bok Gyo Jeong, 2025. "Gendered Disparities in Funding for Non-Profit, Hybrid, and for-Profit Start-Ups," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 169-182, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jsocen:v:16:y:2025:i:1:p:169-182
    DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2022.2143871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19420676.2022.2143871
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19420676.2022.2143871?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jsocen:v:16:y:2025:i:1:p:169-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJSE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.