IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v28y2025i8p929-944.html

Media attention and institutional trust: examining public risk and benefit perceptions of nuclear energy in Southeast Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Shirley S. Ho
  • Wufan Jia
  • Chang He

Abstract

Adopting the social amplification of risk framework, this research examines how media attention and trust in nuclear-related institutions shape public perceptions of the risks and benefits associated with nuclear energy, as well as support for it, in countries at an early stage of nuclear energy development. Analyses of survey data (N = 4,501) from three Southeast Asian countries—Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia—revealed that media attention was positively associated with trust in scientists, business operators, governments, and non-profit environmental organizations in all three countries. Trust in these institutions was positively associated with the perception of benefits associated with nuclear energy. Trust in scientists was positively related to the perception of risks associated with nuclear energy. The findings supported and extended the social amplification of risk framework. They also provide practical implications for designing communication strategies and implementing nuclear energy policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Shirley S. Ho & Wufan Jia & Chang He, 2025. "Media attention and institutional trust: examining public risk and benefit perceptions of nuclear energy in Southeast Asia," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(8), pages 929-944, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:28:y:2025:i:8:p:929-944
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2025.2553877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2025.2553877
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2025.2553877?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:28:y:2025:i:8:p:929-944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.