IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v28y2025i8p855-875.html

How is cybersecurity discussed across media channels? Exploratory analyses of Twitter content and news reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Meissner
  • Alexander J. Wilke
  • Miglė Puikytė

Abstract

As digitalization and the increasing connectivity of devices continue to shape everyday life, cybersecurity is becoming increasingly critical. However, many citizens feel unable to take even basic protective measures against cyber threats. Understanding how cybersecurity is discussed in public discourse and how this discourse can be improved is therefore essential. Risk communication research has paid limited attention to this issue. This study adopts a cross-platform approach, combining an exploratory computational analysis of Twitter (X) content with a theory-driven manual content analysis of reports from leading German news outlets. The dataset includes 242,715 tweets and 574 news articles. For the manual content analysis, the study uses Protection Motivation Theory. Our findings offer novel insights into the public discourse on cybersecurity in Germany. On Twitter (X), data security and data protection emerge as dominant topics, with cybersecurity experts being the most influential voices. The news media analysis reveals a tendency to emphasize cyber threats more frequently than protective behaviors, with limited attribution of responsibility for security measures to individual citizens. From a risk communication perspective, both findings highlight a lack of motivational messaging aimed at enhancing citizens’ self-efficacy in adopting protective behaviors. We therefore recommend that communicators and news media place greater emphasis on promoting cybersecurity practices and fostering public engagement in digital self-protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Meissner & Alexander J. Wilke & Miglė Puikytė, 2025. "How is cybersecurity discussed across media channels? Exploratory analyses of Twitter content and news reporting," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(8), pages 855-875, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:28:y:2025:i:8:p:855-875
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2025.2553079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2025.2553079
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2025.2553079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:28:y:2025:i:8:p:855-875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.