IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v28y2025i2p184-189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Between doubt and deference: trust and harm in the risk society

Author

Listed:
  • Colin Strong
  • Tamara Ansons

Abstract

This commentary builds on Osman’s (2025) analysis of psychological harm in consumer products with internet connectivity (CPIC) by examining how AI and digital platforms are crucial in reshaping the epistemic environment, driven by changing notions of societal trust and perceptions of expertise. Drawing on evidence from studies of trust in digital environments and emerging patterns of online collective action, we argue that the rise of AI-enabled platforms has created a paradigm shift: from vertical, institution-centred models of trust and harm prevention to horizontal, network-based systems of knowledge validation and risk assessment. This transformation demands new frameworks for understanding psychological harm—ones that can account for both direct technological impacts and the broader reconfiguration of how society negotiates truth, expertise, and responsibility in an AI-enabled world. It also sets out the challenge for traditional, vertically structured institutions to more effectively engage with the public.

Suggested Citation

  • Colin Strong & Tamara Ansons, 2025. "Between doubt and deference: trust and harm in the risk society," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 184-189, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:28:y:2025:i:2:p:184-189
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2025.2496236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2025.2496236
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2025.2496236?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:28:y:2025:i:2:p:184-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.