Author
Listed:
- Robbe Geysmans
- Catrinel Turcanu
- Sigrid Griet Eeckhout
Abstract
Citizen participation in the governance of radioactive waste is crucial, not only in the siting and design of repositories, but during their construction and operation and even after their closure. However, this need for citizen involvement poses unique challenges due to the long time scales involved in the various phases of radioactive waste management (RWM). As participation needs to span over several generations, the involvement of young people in decision making opens up participation processes to innovation, ensuring at the same time their durability and representativeness. However, young people are currently underrepresented in various national radioactive waste management initiatives, which brings into question the durability and inclusiveness of participation processes. This paper uses a multi-method approach entailing focus groups and surveys to examine young people’s perceptions of radioactive waste, their potential involvement in its management, and how such involvement can be facilitated. A representative survey (N = 1060) of the Belgian population shows that while risk perceptions and knowledge about radioactive waste are largely similar across age groups, differences exist with regard to the modalities of radioactive waste management (e.g. waste retrievability). We also found that young people (age 18–25) are less inclined to seek active participation in decision-making processes. Focus group discussions further highlight that aligning participatory initiatives with youths’ interests (e.g. climate change) and integrating them into existing structures (e.g. school parliaments) could enhance youngsters’ awareness and involvement in radioactive waste management.
Suggested Citation
Robbe Geysmans & Catrinel Turcanu & Sigrid Griet Eeckhout, 2025.
"Engaging youth in the management of radioactive waste: perceptions, intentions and expectations,"
Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 105-123, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:28:y:2025:i:1:p:105-123
DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2025.2491093
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:28:y:2025:i:1:p:105-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.