IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v27y2024i7p770-788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling social risk amplification, harmful products, and product recall as the basis of a risk assessment procedure

Author

Listed:
  • Yun Liu
  • Jerry Busby
  • Bhakti Stephan Onggo

Abstract

Public response to risk often over- or under-estimates risk because individuals and social processes interact. This paper applies agent-based modelling to understand public risk perception in response to product recall through a risk model that forms the basis of a risk assessment procedure. We model collective response to risks associated with the consumption of contaminated or defective products in the context of product recalls during contamination scandals such as the cases of contaminated milk products in China. The main contribution is that we demonstrate how agent-based modelling can be used to study social risk amplification in a product contamination crisis. The main innovation of our model is that it integrates an event discovery step – in which risk perceivers assimilate risk through the risk beliefs of others, direct experience, and product recall decisions – with a recreancy assessment step – in which risk perceivers make judgments about wrongfulness. We show how the model can be calibrated with a consumer survey and validated. Finally, we demonstrate how to use the model for assessing and managing risk in organizational crises of a similar nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Yun Liu & Jerry Busby & Bhakti Stephan Onggo, 2024. "Modelling social risk amplification, harmful products, and product recall as the basis of a risk assessment procedure," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(7), pages 770-788, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:27:y:2024:i:7:p:770-788
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2024.2360917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2024.2360917
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2024.2360917?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:27:y:2024:i:7:p:770-788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.