IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v26y2023i2p184-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological distance, risk perception, and affect: Texas residents’ support for carbon capture and storage

Author

Listed:
  • Prerna Shah
  • Janet Z. Yang
  • LeeAnn Kahlor

Abstract

Climate change poses innumerable threats to economic, social, and environmental systems. Despite our best efforts, emerging research indicates that mitigation and adaptation efforts must incorporate technologies such as carbon capture and storage (CCS) to draw carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it elsewhere. This study examines how psychological distance and perceived risk pertaining to climate change influence Texans’ support for CCS through perceived CCS costs/benefits and affect. Overall, the results indicate that perceived psychological distance of climate change influences support for CCS through risk perception about local climate change impacts, perceived CCS benefits, and affective evaluation. Political partisanship moderates the relationship between psychological distance and climate change risk perception, but not the relationship between psychological distance and support for CCS.

Suggested Citation

  • Prerna Shah & Janet Z. Yang & LeeAnn Kahlor, 2023. "Psychological distance, risk perception, and affect: Texas residents’ support for carbon capture and storage," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 184-198, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:26:y:2023:i:2:p:184-198
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2022.2116084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2022.2116084
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2022.2116084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:26:y:2023:i:2:p:184-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.