IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v25y2022i9p1085-1097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The drivers and barriers of wearing a facemask during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Switzerland

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Bearth
  • Michael Siegrist

Abstract

Encouraging people to wear a facemask in situations where social distance is not possible is a relatively low-cost and low-impact measure to protect people from infections with SARS-CoV-2. Thus, the present study investigated various barriers and drivers regarding people’s self-reported wearing of protective facemasks in mandatory and non-mandatory situations. Data from a longitudinal study with four waves in Switzerland was used (N = 728). The findings show that the compliance with “wearing a facemask” increased over the duration of the pandemic, particularly after the lockdown measures were lifted. More importantly, the study shows that perceived effectiveness of wearing a facemask are important drivers, while various perceived costs (e.g., financial, comfort) act as barriers. Risk communicators should be aware that the communicated effectiveness (self or others) is associated with people’s willingness to wear facemasks in public, independently of the involved and perceived costs or whether wearing a facemask is mandatory or not.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2022.2038244 .

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Bearth & Michael Siegrist, 2022. "The drivers and barriers of wearing a facemask during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Switzerland," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(9), pages 1085-1097, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:25:y:2022:i:9:p:1085-1097
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2022.2038244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2022.2038244
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2022.2038244?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:25:y:2022:i:9:p:1085-1097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.