IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v25y2022i7p860-873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk perception, affect, and information avoidance during the 2016 U.S. Presidential election

Author

Listed:
  • Won-Ki Moon
  • Lee Ann Kahlor
  • Janet Zheng Yang
  • Hayoung Sally Lim

Abstract

During a presidential election cycle, voters consume information to alleviate uncertainty about the candidates and the process. As a result, elections offer an interesting (and somewhat novel) context for studying risk-related information behaviors. Here we argue that individuals avoid certain information, depending on the amount of risk they perceive and to what extent they experience risk-related affect. Based on national survey data collected one month prior to the 2016 U.S. presidential election (N = 512), we found that risk perception influenced information avoidance through affective responses to the different types of risks. Specifically, financial and political risk influenced avoidance through negative affective response to risk, while policy risk influenced avoidance through both positive and negative affective response. Thus, the mediation of affective responses varies by the type of perceived risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Won-Ki Moon & Lee Ann Kahlor & Janet Zheng Yang & Hayoung Sally Lim, 2022. "Risk perception, affect, and information avoidance during the 2016 U.S. Presidential election," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(7), pages 860-873, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:25:y:2022:i:7:p:860-873
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2022.2038247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2022.2038247
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2022.2038247?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:25:y:2022:i:7:p:860-873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.