IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v25y2022i6p778-790.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge of majority scientific agreement on anthropogenic climate change predicts perceived global risk better than perceived personal risk

Author

Listed:
  • Patrice Kohl
  • Chloe Wardropper

Abstract

Studies examining climate change risk perceptions rarely differentiate between personal and general risk perceptions. Researchers could come to conflicting conclusions about what variables are important in predicting people’s perceptions of risk if they do not differentiate between perceptions of personal and general risk. In this study, we used data from a survey of residents in a Midwestern region of the United States to examine the relationship between two measures of knowledge and perceptions of the risk of climate change at personal and the global (i.e. general) levels. Knowledge of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change significantly predicted perceptions of both types of risks, but was more strongly related to greater risk perceptions at the global level. Knowledge of climate change’s impact on regional flooding predicted greater climate change risk perception, and we did not find a difference in its association with risk perception at the global versus the personal level. Understanding how different types of knowledge influence peoples’ perception of climate change risks can foster a better understanding of related decision-making processes and used to support more strategic public education and communication on climate change.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2022.2028883 .

Suggested Citation

  • Patrice Kohl & Chloe Wardropper, 2022. "Knowledge of majority scientific agreement on anthropogenic climate change predicts perceived global risk better than perceived personal risk," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 778-790, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:25:y:2022:i:6:p:778-790
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2022.2028883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2022.2028883
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2022.2028883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:25:y:2022:i:6:p:778-790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.