IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v24y2021i12p1544-1557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Militarisation, masculinisation and organisational exclusion in the crisis preparedness sector

Author

Listed:
  • Aida Alvinius
  • Edward Deverell
  • Susanne Hede

Abstract

This study aims to deepen the understanding of processes that affect collaboration between professions and organisations in the crisis preparedness domain from a gender perspective. A total of twenty-three Swedish duty officers participated in the study. The analysis of the interviews show that collaboration can be understood as (a) the militarisation of civil crisis management actors, which means that many of the work processes and cultures that originate in military organisations can now be found in the security and crisis management sector; (b) the masculinisation, which means that when male dominance appears to prevail, active strategies are used against women, civilian personnel and also inexperienced colleagues and (c) organisational exclusion which emerges particularly in situations where collaboration between female-dominated and male-dominated organisations are required. The findings are important for crisis preparedness research and practice and should work in favour of evening out asymmetries in collaborative crisis management.

Suggested Citation

  • Aida Alvinius & Edward Deverell & Susanne Hede, 2021. "Militarisation, masculinisation and organisational exclusion in the crisis preparedness sector," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(12), pages 1544-1557, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:24:y:2021:i:12:p:1544-1557
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2021.1881989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2021.1881989
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2021.1881989?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:24:y:2021:i:12:p:1544-1557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.