IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v23y2020i7-8p1047-1051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Did the world overlook the media’s early warning of COVID-19?

Author

Listed:
  • King-wa Fu
  • Yuner Zhu

Abstract

This perspective is written to give a rapid response to discuss the role of media in risk communication in the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyze two sets of media data, China’s social media and global news event, and draw a few initial observations in relation to the impacts of China’s information control policy, global risk governance, and the role of WHO.

Suggested Citation

  • King-wa Fu & Yuner Zhu, 2020. "Did the world overlook the media’s early warning of COVID-19?," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(7-8), pages 1047-1051, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:23:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1047-1051
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2020.1756380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2020.1756380
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2020.1756380?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Milena Lopreite & Pietro Panzarasa & Michelangelo Puliga & Massimo Riccaboni, 2020. "Early warnings of COVID-19 outbreaks across Europe from social media?," Papers 2008.02649, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2020.
    2. Josephine Borghi & Garrett W. Brown, 2022. "Taking Systems Thinking to the Global Level: Using the WHO Building Blocks to Describe and Appraise the Global Health System in Relation to COVID‐19," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(2), pages 193-207, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:23:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1047-1051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.