IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v21y2018i4p463-479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How far is how far enough? Safety perception and acceptance of extra-high-voltage power lines in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Peter M. Wiedemann
  • Franziska Boerner
  • Frank Claus

Abstract

The results of a 2 × 2 factorial online experiment are reported. The first factor refers to the information on precautionary measures and the second factor on the information regarding the share of EMF exposure from extra-high-voltage power lines compared to overall EMF exposure measured in-house. The study is based on a community sample of 440 subjects. Information on the share of EMF exposure from extra-high-voltage power lines at the in-house overall EMF exposure has no statistically significant effect of safety distances and acceptance distances. Further findings indicate that communications of precautionary measures produce a countervailing effect: on average, subjects require a higher distance from their homes compared to those who were not informed about precautionary measures. However, there is also a positive effect of precautionary information on the acceptance belief. Subjects who received this information are, in average, less negative about the claim that compliance with the value limit is sufficient in order to agree with the construction of a power line. Possible explanations of the findings such as cognitive dissonance, negativity bias, and style of information processing are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter M. Wiedemann & Franziska Boerner & Frank Claus, 2018. "How far is how far enough? Safety perception and acceptance of extra-high-voltage power lines in Germany," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 463-479, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:21:y:2018:i:4:p:463-479
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2016.1220415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2016.1220415
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2016.1220415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarah Driessen & Lambert Bodewein & Dagmar Dechent & David Graefrath & Kristina Schmiedchen & Dominik Stunder & Thomas Kraus & Anne-Kathrin Petri, 2020. "Biological and health-related effects of weak static magnetic fields (≤ 1 mT) in humans and vertebrates: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:21:y:2018:i:4:p:463-479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.