IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v18y2015i10p1230-1258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A conceptual Object-Oriented Bayesian Network (OOBN) for modeling aircraft carrier-based UAS safety risk

Author

Listed:
  • James T. Luxhøj

Abstract

This paper illustrates the conceptual development of a demonstration Object-Oriented Bayesian Network (OOBN) to integrate the hazards associated with an experimental Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) planned for deployment from an aircraft carrier. The final Air/Ship Integration (A/SI) demonstration model is characterized by a top-level Bayesian network model with nine sub-nets comprising 70 causal factors with 15 mitigations. With the creation of a probabilistic model, inferences about changes to the states of the causal factors given the presence or absence of controls or mitigations can be ascertained. These inferences build on qualitative reasoning and enable an analyst to identify the most prominent causal factor groupings leading to a prioritization of the most influential causal factors. Mitigation effects can be systematically studied and assessed. The A/SI OOBN demonstration model illustrates the construction of an integrative safety risk model that may be used to compute a higher-order system mishap probability for an experimental UAS that interacts with ship operations in a highly severe, dynamic sea environment. In addition to computing mishap probabilities, the Bayesian approach may also be used to support control contingency management for possible mitigation implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • James T. Luxhøj, 2015. "A conceptual Object-Oriented Bayesian Network (OOBN) for modeling aircraft carrier-based UAS safety risk," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(10), pages 1230-1258, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:18:y:2015:i:10:p:1230-1258
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2014.913664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2014.913664
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2014.913664?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:18:y:2015:i:10:p:1230-1258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.