IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v17y2014i5p593-595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commentary on the Löfstedt substitution paper

Author

Listed:
  • Julie Girling

Abstract

As noted by Professor Löfstedt in his paper, the substitution of chemicals with safer alternatives forms the core of the EU's flagship REACH Regulation. However, it is important to acknowledge that the principle of substitution is not something new dreamt up by Brussels bureaucrats, but rather reflects existing business practice. Therefore, one would think that this is an issue that both business and regulators can agree on. Of course, in practice the reality is much more nuanced. Substitution can only be effective provided certain conditions are met and that the process is based on sound science and a full risk assessment. By rushing substitution without thinking through the consequences, regulators can risk the process being at best ineffective, and at worst causing significant harm to human health and the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie Girling, 2014. "Commentary on the Löfstedt substitution paper," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 593-595, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:17:y:2014:i:5:p:593-595
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2013.875937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2013.875937
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2013.875937?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:17:y:2014:i:5:p:593-595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.