IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v16y2013i1p97-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Part I: the role of trust in patient noncompliance: a qualitative case study of users of statins for the chronic treatment of high-cholesterol in New York City

Author

Listed:
  • Sweta Chakraborty

Abstract

Current reports state that 50--70% of American patients who have been prescribed chronic drug therapies do not take their medications in accordance with their physician's instructions. This not only leads to poorer end-prognoses, but can add up to 100 billion dollars in terms of public health costs stemming from more rapid onsets of disease, higher rates of hospitalizations, and lost productivity. The unresolved magnitude of such adverse outcomes merits a deeper inspection into the risk of noncompliance, particularly in relation to the current climate of social distrust. This study applied the mental models approach for the purpose of understanding lay perceptions in relation to existing scientific information on the risk of noncompliance. In accordance with the approach, 30 participants were interviewed and 200 questionnaires were administered in New York City to eligible users of statins for the chronic treatment of high cholesterol. This original research reports the primary findings from the 30 qualitative in-depth interviews. Several themes of distrust in various actors in the healthcare system were identified during the interviews and a suggested correlation between distrust and noncompliance emerged. The results of these findings should be taken into consideration for any future efforts at addressing risks associated with patient noncompliance.

Suggested Citation

  • Sweta Chakraborty, 2013. "Part I: the role of trust in patient noncompliance: a qualitative case study of users of statins for the chronic treatment of high-cholesterol in New York City," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 97-112, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:16:y:2013:i:1:p:97-112
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2012.727097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2012.727097
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2012.727097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:16:y:2013:i:1:p:97-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.