IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v15y2012i4p355-371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citizen views about public meetings

Author

Listed:
  • John C. Besley
  • Katherine A. McComas
  • Craig W. Trumbo

Abstract

The current study seeks to demonstrate that a citizen views about public meeting structure and related groups matter in predicting satisfaction with public engagement and willingness to attend future meetings. Public health agencies frequently use public meetings to communicate risk information, but relatively little social science research has examined how potential meeting participants view them. Using survey data ( N = 866) collected in seven US communities where health agencies were investigating possible local cancer clusters and holding public meetings to communicate with local residents, the current study replicates and extends an earlier inquiry related to citizens satisfaction with public meetings used for risk communication. Whereas previous research found that expectations, health agency credibility, and risk perceptions predicted satisfaction with public meetings, the current results did not show a significant relationship between agency credibility, risk perceptions, and satisfaction. Further, the results suggest it may make sense to consider 'views about public meetings' as a single measure that includes citizens' structural expectations for meetings. Finally, the current study finds that views about public officials and views about meetings relate to individuals' willingness to attend future meetings. Additional variable development and modeling research is suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • John C. Besley & Katherine A. McComas & Craig W. Trumbo, 2012. "Citizen views about public meetings," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 355-371, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:15:y:2012:i:4:p:355-371
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2011.634516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2011.634516
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2011.634516?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:15:y:2012:i:4:p:355-371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.