IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v14y2011i1p125-139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two worlds of assessment of environmental health issues: the case of contaminated water wells in Ramat ha-Sharon

Author

Listed:
  • Brenda Geiger
  • Yovav Eshet

Abstract

This research examines two modes of assessment of environmental health risks and the transformation of these risks into public health issues while relying on the specific case of well-water toxicity and mega dose of electromagnetic radiation found in one prosperous town in the center of Israel -- Ramat ha-Sharon. Based on official and scientific documentation and interviews conducted at three time periods with randomly selected town residents from contaminated neighborhoods ( N = 169), this study shows the discrepancy between the 'objective' experts' standards for assessing environmental health risks and the public's subjective perception and evaluation of the impact of these risks on their health and well-being. Even though, by experts' standards, the well-water toxicity remained constant over the three interview sessions, Ramat ha-Sharon town residents' subjective levels of concern and perception of risk fluctuated as a function of news media and municipality announcements and residents' perceived ability to minimize the risk. This study also shows the complex and multidisciplinary nature of environmental health risk assessments and the need to relocate them into the broader socioeconomic and political context in which they are embedded.

Suggested Citation

  • Brenda Geiger & Yovav Eshet, 2011. "Two worlds of assessment of environmental health issues: the case of contaminated water wells in Ramat ha-Sharon," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 125-139, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:14:y:2011:i:1:p:125-139
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2010.505688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2010.505688
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2010.505688?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:14:y:2011:i:1:p:125-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.