IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v10y2007i6p759-772.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost Analysis of Particulate Matter Control Programs -- A Case Study of Tokyo

Author

Listed:
  • A. Scott Voorhees
  • Iwao Uchiyama

Abstract

The objectives of this case study were to assess economic costs of existing environmental policies of particulate matter (PM) in Tokyo and compare the costs to estimates of benefits developed previously. The purchasing power parity-adjusted one year estimates for the costs of PM pollution control and prevention were: (1) $720 million (USD) for stationary source controls, (2) a range of $690 million to $1.1 billion for diesel motor vehicle controls, (3) $4.2 million for governmental employee salaries, (4) $50 million for governmental financial assistance, and (5) a range of $1.5 billion to $1.9 billion for total costs. Overall these cost results appear more likely to be overestimates than underestimates due to a number of conservative assumptions, in particular for mobile source controls. Using human health and productivity benefits calculated in a previous study to be $38 billion USD, and annualized capital and operating costs from this work, the best net ratio of benefits to costs was 20 to 1. This suggests that Tokyo's PM pollution control policies in total were economically very effective in the past, and that stricter controls or broader regulatory coverage can be justified in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Scott Voorhees & Iwao Uchiyama, 2007. "Cost Analysis of Particulate Matter Control Programs -- A Case Study of Tokyo," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(6), pages 759-772, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:10:y:2007:i:6:p:759-772
    DOI: 10.1080/13669870701342561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669870701342561
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669870701342561?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:10:y:2007:i:6:p:759-772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.