IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jpropr/v20y2003i4p343-369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The property market impact of British enterprise zones

Author

Listed:
  • C Jones
  • N Dunse
  • D Martin

Abstract

Enterprise zones (EZs) were originally set up in the United Kingdom in 1980 as experiments to stimulate free enterprise, and located in areas that had suffered significant employment loss. Unlike their namesakes elsewhere in the world British EZs are essentially property led local economic initiatives providing incentives over their ten-year life in the form of free rates to occupiers of commercial and industrial properties and 100% capital tax allowances which can be set against corporation or income tax. In all 36 EZs have been designated to date in the UK between 1982 and 1996. This paper analyses the detailed impact on local property markets of the three EZs designated in the Clydeside conurbation. It considers their role as incubators of new firms and demonstrations of enterprise, and the potential of spatial competition between zones. The evidence from Clydebank is that zone status expanded its stock of modern industrial space but once its EZ status was terminated it did not prove to be a catalyst for economic growth. The local EZ's potential role as an incubator of new firm formation has not produced long term fruit. Similarly the demonstration effect of the EZ has not led to a sustainable local industrial property market where new development is viable. The Inverclyde zone was smaller and much of it remains undeveloped. The failure of the Inverclyde zone to complete its task can be directly attributed to the spatial competition with the rival EZ in Lanarkshire. The importance of local spatial competition between EZs is demonstrated clearly in this study and is exacerbated by the emphasis on attracting inward investment by the Lanarkshire EZ. Overall the evidence of the property market impact of EZs is that they should be judged on a long term basis and that a short term perspective, even after ten years, exaggerates their significance. The results cast serious doubt on the theoretical underpinning of property led initiatives designed to address market failure.

Suggested Citation

  • C Jones & N Dunse & D Martin, 2003. "The property market impact of British enterprise zones," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 343-369, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jpropr:v:20:y:2003:i:4:p:343-369
    DOI: 10.1080/0959991042000182010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0959991042000182010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0959991042000182010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Colin A. Jones, 2009. "Remaking the Monopoly Board: Urban Economic Change and Property Investment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(11), pages 2363-2380, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jpropr:v:20:y:2003:i:4:p:343-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJPR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.