Not poles apart: “Whither reform?” and “Whence reform?”
Tis only as the shades of night are falling that the Owl of Minerva spreads her mighty wings and takes to flight. (Hegel) The paper “Whence Reform?” by the Polish economists Marek Dabrowski, Stanislaw Gomulka, and Jacek Rostowski (DGR) is a welcome and revealing commentary on what is called the “Stiglitz Perspective.”1 Our main response is gratitude at DGR's agreement with the main theses of “Whither Reform!” such as the critiques of voucher privatization and of the attempts to quickly install institutional reforms involving long agency chains. Our positions are not poles apart. We say: “With 'critics' like these, who needs supporters?” It is nevertheless clear that DGR have worked hard to either discover or imagine disagreements and “mistakes” in the “Stiglitz perspective” that will help preserve their good standing in the fraternity of neoliberal reformers. We appreciate the exigencies of maintaining reputational capital so we will cross swords in some of the side scrimmages even though the main battle seems to be over. While we will not contest every real or imagined disagreement, we do think that identifying some of the major areas of agreement and disagreement may be useful in helping shape appropriate policies for the countries in transition going forward.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 4 (2001)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/GPRE19|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/GPRE19|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jpolrf:v:4:y:2001:i:4:p:325-338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.