IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v117y2022i537p156-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing for Balance in Social Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Derek Feng
  • Randolf Altmeyer
  • Derek Stafford
  • Nicholas A. Christakis
  • Harrison H. Zhou

Abstract

Friendship and antipathy exist in concert with one another in real social networks. Despite the role they play in social interactions, antagonistic ties are poorly understood and infrequently measured. One important theory of negative ties that has received relatively little empirical evaluation is balance theory, the codification of the adage “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” and similar sayings. Unbalanced triangles are those with an odd number of negative ties, and the theory posits that such triangles are rare. To test for balance, previous works have used a permutation test on the edge signs. The flaw in this method, however, is that it assumes that negative and positive edges are interchangeable. In reality, they could not be more different. Here, we propose a novel test of balance that accounts for this discrepancy and show that our test is more accurate at detecting balance. Along the way, we prove asymptotic normality of the test statistic under our null model, which is of independent interest. Our case study is a novel dataset of signed networks we collected from 32 isolated, rural villages in Honduras. Contrary to previous results, we find that there is only marginal evidence for balance in social tie formation in this setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Derek Feng & Randolf Altmeyer & Derek Stafford & Nicholas A. Christakis & Harrison H. Zhou, 2022. "Testing for Balance in Social Networks," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 117(537), pages 156-174, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:117:y:2022:i:537:p:156-174
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1764850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2020.1764850
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2020.1764850?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:117:y:2022:i:537:p:156-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.