IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v116y2020i533p269-282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning Individualized Treatment Rules for Multiple-Domain Latent Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan Chen
  • Donglin Zeng
  • Yuanjia Wang

Abstract

For many mental disorders, latent mental status from multiple-domain psychological or clinical symptoms may perform as a better characterization of the underlying disorder status than a simple summary score of the symptoms, and they may also serve as more reliable and representative features to differentiate treatment responses. Therefore, to address the complexity and heterogeneity of treatment responses for mental disorders, we provide a new paradigm for learning optimal individualized treatment rules (ITRs) by modeling patients’ latent mental status. We first learn the multi-domain latent states at baseline from the observed symptoms under a restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM) model, which encodes patients’ heterogeneous symptoms using an economical number of latent variables and yet remains flexible. We then optimize a value function defined by the latent states after treatment by exploiting a transformation of the observed symptoms based on the RBM without modeling the relationship between the latent mental states before and after treatment. The optimal treatment rules are derived using a weighted large margin classifier. We derive the convergence rate of the proposed estimator under the latent models. Simulation studies are conducted to test the performance of the proposed method. Finally, we apply the developed method to real world studies and we demonstrate the utility and advantage of our method in tailoring treatments for patients with major depression, and identify patient subgroups informative for treatment recommendations. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan Chen & Donglin Zeng & Yuanjia Wang, 2020. "Learning Individualized Treatment Rules for Multiple-Domain Latent Outcomes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(533), pages 269-282, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:116:y:2020:i:533:p:269-282
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1817751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2020.1817751
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2020.1817751?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:116:y:2020:i:533:p:269-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.