IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v115y2020i532p1675-1688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Tradeoffs in Matched Designs Comparing US-Trained and Internationally Trained Surgeons

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel D. Pimentel
  • Rachel R. Kelz

Abstract

Does receiving a medical education outside the United States impact a surgeon’s performance? We study this question by matching operations performed by internationally trained surgeons to those performed by US-trained surgeons in reanalysis of a large health outcomes study. An effective matched design must achieve several goals, including balancing covariate distributions marginally, ensuring units within individual pairs have similar values on key covariates, and using a sufficiently large sample from the raw data. Yet in our study, optimizing some of these goals forces less desirable results on others. We address such tradeoffs from a multi-objective optimization perspective by creating matched designs that are Pareto optimal with respect to two goals. We provide general tools for generating representative subsets of Pareto optimal solution sets and articulate how they can be used to improve decision-making in observational study design. In the motivating surgical outcomes study, formulating a multi-objective version of the problem helps us balance an important variable without sacrificing two other design goals, average closeness of matched pairs on a multivariate distance and size of the final matched sample. Supplementary materials for this article, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work, are available as an online supplement.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel D. Pimentel & Rachel R. Kelz, 2020. "Optimal Tradeoffs in Matched Designs Comparing US-Trained and Internationally Trained Surgeons," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(532), pages 1675-1688, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:115:y:2020:i:532:p:1675-1688
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1720693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2020.1720693
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2020.1720693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:115:y:2020:i:532:p:1675-1688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.