IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v115y2020i531p1406-1419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Sparse Linear Prediction for Block-missing Multi-modality Data Without Imputation

Author

Listed:
  • Guan Yu
  • Quefeng Li
  • Dinggang Shen
  • Yufeng Liu

Abstract

In modern scientific research, data are often collected from multiple modalities. Since different modalities could provide complementary information, statistical prediction methods using multimodality data could deliver better prediction performance than using single modality data. However, one special challenge for using multimodality data is related to block-missing data. In practice, due to dropouts or the high cost of measures, the observations of a certain modality can be missing completely for some subjects. In this paper, we propose a new direct sparse regression procedure using covariance from multimodality data (DISCOM). Our proposed DISCOM method includes two steps to find the optimal linear prediction of a continuous response variable using block-missing multimodality predictors. In the first step, rather than deleting or imputing missing data, we make use of all available information to estimate the covariance matrix of the predictors and the cross-covariance vector between the predictors and the response variable. The proposed new estimate of the covariance matrix is a linear combination of the identity matrix, the estimates of the intra-modality covariance matrix and the cross-modality covariance matrix. Flexible estimates for both the sub-Gaussian and heavy-tailed cases are considered. In the second step, based on the estimated covariance matrix and the estimated cross-covariance vector, an extended Lasso-type estimator is used to deliver a sparse estimate of the coefficients in the optimal linear prediction. The number of samples that are effectively used by DISCOM is the minimum number of samples with available observations from two modalities, which can be much larger than the number of samples with complete observations from all modalities. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated by theoretical studies, simulated examples, and a real application from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. The comparison between DISCOM and some existing methods also indicates the advantages of our proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Guan Yu & Quefeng Li & Dinggang Shen & Yufeng Liu, 2020. "Optimal Sparse Linear Prediction for Block-missing Multi-modality Data Without Imputation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(531), pages 1406-1419, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:115:y:2020:i:531:p:1406-1419
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2019.1632079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2019.1632079
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2019.1632079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhongzhe Ouyang & Lu Wang & Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, 2024. "Imputation-Based Variable Selection Method for Block-Wise Missing Data When Integrating Multiple Longitudinal Studies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Xiuli Du & Xiaohu Jiang & Jinguan Lin, 2023. "Multinomial Logistic Factor Regression for Multi-source Functional Block-wise Missing Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 975-1001, September.
    3. Xiao, Zhen & Zhang, Qi, 2022. "Dimension reduction for block-missing data based on sparse sliced inverse regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:115:y:2020:i:531:p:1406-1419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.