IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v108y2013i502p411-428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spline-Based Emulators for Radiative Shock Experiments With Measurement Error

Author

Listed:
  • Avishek Chakraborty
  • Bani K. Mallick
  • Ryan G. Mcclarren
  • Carolyn C. Kuranz
  • Derek Bingham
  • Michael J. Grosskopf
  • Erica M. Rutter
  • Hayes F. Stripling
  • R. Paul Drake

Abstract

Radiation hydrodynamics and radiative shocks are of fundamental interest in the high-energy-density physics research due to their importance in understanding astrophysical phenomena such as supernovae. In the laboratory, experiments can produce shocks with fundamentally similar physics on reduced scales. However, the cost and time constraints of the experiment necessitate use of a computer algorithm to generate a reasonable number of outputs for making valid inference. We focus on modeling emulators that can efficiently assimilate these two sources of information accounting for their intrinsic differences. The goal is to learn how to predict the breakout time of the shock given the information on associated parameters such as pressure and energy. Under the framework of the Kennedy--O'Hagan model, we introduce an emulator based on adaptive splines. Depending on the preference of having an interpolator for the computer code output or a computationally fast model, a couple of different variants are proposed. Those choices are shown to perform better than the conventional Gaussian-process-based emulator and a few other choices of nonstationary models. For the shock experiment dataset, a number of features related to computer model validation such as using interpolator, necessity of discrepancy function, or accounting for experimental heterogeneity are discussed, implemented, and validated for the current dataset. In addition to the typical Gaussian measurement error for real data, we consider alternative specifications suitable to incorporate noninformativeness in error distributions, more in agreement with the current experiment. Comparative diagnostics, to highlight the effect of measurement error model on predictive uncertainty, are also presented. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Avishek Chakraborty & Bani K. Mallick & Ryan G. Mcclarren & Carolyn C. Kuranz & Derek Bingham & Michael J. Grosskopf & Erica M. Rutter & Hayes F. Stripling & R. Paul Drake, 2013. "Spline-Based Emulators for Radiative Shock Experiments With Measurement Error," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(502), pages 411-428, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:108:y:2013:i:502:p:411-428
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2013.770688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2013.770688
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2013.770688?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patrick R. Conrad & Youssef M. Marzouk & Natesh S. Pillai & Aaron Smith, 2016. "Accelerating Asymptotically Exact MCMC for Computationally Intensive Models via Local Approximations," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1591-1607, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:108:y:2013:i:502:p:411-428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.