IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Interactions in the Analysis of Variance

Listed author(s):
  • P. L. Davies
Registered author(s):

    The standard model for the analysis of variance is over-parameterized. The resulting identifiability problem is typically solved by placing linear constraints on the parameters. In the case of the interactions, these require that the marginal sums be zero. Although seemingly neutral, these conditions have unintended consequences: the interactions are of necessity connected whether or not this is justified, the minimum number of nonzero interactions is four, and, in particular, it is not possible to have a single interaction in one cell. There is no reason why nature should conform to these constraints. The approach taken in this article is one of sparsity: the linear factor effects are chosen so as to minimize the number of nonzero interactions subject to consistency with the data. The resulting interactions are attached to individual cells making their interpretation easier irrespective of whether they are isolated or form clusters. In general, the calculation of a sparse solution is a difficult combinatorial problem but the special nature of the analysis of variance simplifies matters considerably. In many cases, the sparse L 0 solution coincides with the L 1 solution obtained by minimizing the sum of the absolute residuals and that can be calculated quickly. The identity of the two solutions can be checked either algorithmically or by applying known sufficient conditions for equality.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Journal of the American Statistical Association.

    Volume (Year): 107 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 500 (December)
    Pages: 1502-1509

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:107:y:2012:i:500:p:1502-1509
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2012.726895
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:107:y:2012:i:500:p:1502-1509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.