IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Testing for Gene--Environment and Gene--Gene Interactions Under Monotonicity Constraints

  • Summer S. Han
  • Philip S. Rosenberg
  • Nilanjan Chatterjee
Registered author(s):

    Recent genome-wide association studies (GWASs) designed to detect the main effects of genetic markers have had considerable success with many findings validated by replication studies. However, relatively few findings of gene--gene or gene--environment interactions have been successfully reproduced. Besides the main issues associated with insufficient sample size in current studies, a complication is that interactions that rank high based on p -values often correspond to extreme forms of joint effects that are biologically less plausible. To reduce false positives and to increase power, we develop various gene--environment/gene--gene tests based on biologically more plausible constraints using bivariate isotonic regressions for case--control data. We extend our method to exploit gene--environment or gene--gene independence information, integrating the approach proposed by Chatterjee and Carroll. We propose appropriate nonparametric and parametric permutation procedures for evaluating the significance of the tests. Simulations show that our method gains power over traditional unconstrained methods by reducing the sizes of alternative parameter spaces. We apply our method to several real-data examples, including an analysis of bladder cancer data to detect interactions between the NAT2 gene and smoking. We also show that the proposed method is computationally feasible for large-scale problems by applying it to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) lung cancer GWAS data.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Journal of the American Statistical Association.

    Volume (Year): 107 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 500 (December)
    Pages: 1441-1452

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:107:y:2012:i:500:p:1441-1452
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:107:y:2012:i:500:p:1441-1452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.