IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jmkthe/v36y2026i1p16-34.html

Does students’ satisfaction matter to faculty job satisfaction in higher education?

Author

Listed:
  • Mona Nassar
  • Aleksej Heinze
  • Sajjad M. Jasimuddin
  • Chris Procter

Abstract

Drawing on the marketing aspects of customer satisfaction, this paper provides insights into the relationship between students’ and lecturers’ satisfaction in a higher education institution. The study critically adopts the logic of relationship marketing, arguing that students’ satisfaction affects lecturers’ job satisfaction. The relationship between students’ and lecturers’ satisfaction is explored using Balance Theory and Herzberg’s Motivation Theory. The Critical Incident Technique is used for data collection through interviews with student-lecturer dyads. The findings indicate that lecturers’ job satisfaction increases when students’ holistic feedback is explicitly shared with lecturers. Hence, investing in the communication of students’ satisfaction enhances lecturers’ job satisfaction. The current work adds a critical perspective to the relationship between lecturers’ and students’ satisfaction. It highlights a reversal of the accepted logic of relationship marketing, arguing that students’ satisfaction affects lecturers’ satisfaction. The methodological contribution of this work offers a new approach to using critical incident analysis techniques in dyads of students and lecturers.

Suggested Citation

  • Mona Nassar & Aleksej Heinze & Sajjad M. Jasimuddin & Chris Procter, 2026. "Does students’ satisfaction matter to faculty job satisfaction in higher education?," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 16-34, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:36:y:2026:i:1:p:16-34
    DOI: 10.1080/08841241.2022.2149665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08841241.2022.2149665
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08841241.2022.2149665?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:36:y:2026:i:1:p:16-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/WMHE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.