IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jmkthe/v35y2025i2p131-149.html

Managing perceptions of credibility and social attraction: expectations of university presidents on Twitter

Author

Listed:
  • America L. Edwards
  • Leah M. Omilion-Hodges

Abstract

Through deliberate communication and enactment of marketing strategies, university presidents act as institutional brand representatives. One way in which these leaders communicate with their stakeholders is through social-networking sites (SNS). Extant research, however, shows that not only do SNS serve as sources of information, but they also provide cues that receivers, such as student stakeholders, can use to form impressions of senders, such as university presidents. Using a six-condition experiment, we sought to understand how student stakeholders respond to tweets sent by university presidents, depending on the university president’s apparent gender (male/female/undefined) and whether the university president employed the use of a public relations (PR) team to tweet on their behalf. Results indicate that (a) female university presidents are perceived as less credible but more socially attractive than their male or undefined counterparts and (b) university presidents may be able to employ PR teams to tweet on their behalf, without risking their credibility.

Suggested Citation

  • America L. Edwards & Leah M. Omilion-Hodges, 2025. "Managing perceptions of credibility and social attraction: expectations of university presidents on Twitter," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 131-149, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:35:y:2025:i:2:p:131-149
    DOI: 10.1080/08841241.2022.2089942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08841241.2022.2089942
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08841241.2022.2089942?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:35:y:2025:i:2:p:131-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/WMHE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.