IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jmkthe/v10y2000i3p61-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improve Your Marketing Results by Asking Peter F. Drucker's “Five Most Important Questions”

Author

Listed:
  • Constance Rossum
  • Geoffrey Baum

Abstract

This case study focuses on the Office of Marketing & Public Relations at Claremont McKenna College, a highly-selective liberal arts college located in Claremont, California. It demonstrates how Geoffrey Baum, its new PR Director used the five Drucker Tool questions to improve significantly both the image of “marketing” on campus and awareness of the College among its key constituencies. It concludes with a re-evaluation of the initial marketing strategy, based on the growing importance of the internet and Baum's current “customer” perspective as Executive Producer at C-SPAN. The methodology and analytical process is based on the extensive research conducted by Constance Rossum in her Ph.D. dissertation study of eight nonprofits (including three in higher education). It utilizes the Drucker Self-Assessment Tool she developed in 1993, on behalf of the Drucker Foundation for Nonprofit Management, based on the management principles of Peter F. Drucker.

Suggested Citation

  • Constance Rossum & Geoffrey Baum, 2000. "Improve Your Marketing Results by Asking Peter F. Drucker's “Five Most Important Questions”," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 61-76, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:10:y:2000:i:3:p:61-76
    DOI: 10.1300/J050v10n03_04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1300/J050v10n03_04
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1300/J050v10n03_04?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:10:y:2000:i:3:p:61-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/WMHE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.