IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jmedec/v32y2019i1-2p17-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of China’s “limited entertainment order” policy on program diversity: an analysis based on panel threshold model

Author

Listed:
  • Jingwei Cheng
  • Chen Wu
  • Jianyu Chi

Abstract

“Competitive duplication” is widespread in China’s broadcasting market due to fierce competition. To address this issue, the National Radio and Television Administration instituted the “Limited Entertainment Order” (LEO) in 2011 with the purpose of increasing the diversity of television programs. This study employs a Panel Threshold Model and data on 32 provincial TV stations between 2009 and 2014 to examine the effectiveness of the LEO on program diversity. The descriptive statistics reveal a temporary increase in program diversity immediately following implementation of the LEO, which drops quickly thereafter. The empirical findings suggest the policy has been ineffective in promoting the genres of programs offered by provincial broadcasters. In contrast, the individual fixed effects, rating share, and advertisement dependence of TV stations have significant effects on the level of program diversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingwei Cheng & Chen Wu & Jianyu Chi, 2019. "Effects of China’s “limited entertainment order” policy on program diversity: an analysis based on panel threshold model," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1-2), pages 17-34, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jmedec:v:32:y:2019:i:1-2:p:17-34
    DOI: 10.1080/08997764.2021.1888210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08997764.2021.1888210
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08997764.2021.1888210?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jmedec:v:32:y:2019:i:1-2:p:17-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/HMEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.