IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jhudca/v27y2026i2p234-256.html

Aspiration and Wrongful Harm: Why the State Owes a Duty to Cultivate Hope

Author

Listed:
  • Natasha Osben

Abstract

This article argues that the failure of the state to foster the development of the capability to aspire among disadvantaged citizens constitutes a form of wrongful harm. Drawing on the Capability Approach, theories of justice, and recent sociological research on the capacity to aspire, I show that aspiration is not merely a matter of private preference, but a socially embedded capability shaped by structural conditions. When state institutions fail to cultivate this capacity – or worse, actively impede its development – particularly among the disadvantaged, they undermine a central aspect of moral agency. I advance a normative reframing of aspiration deprivation as a state-inflicted harm: under this account, low aspirations are not a tragic by-product of poverty but represent a systematic violation of citizens’ moral personhood and a denial of their capacity for self-authorship. This paper offers a novel account of aspiration as a capability, the deprivation of which grounds duties of rectification, not merely reform. I conclude by arguing that the state’s failure to support this central human capability demands reparative justice – an obligation rooted not in charity or benevolence, but in respect for persons as moral equals.

Suggested Citation

  • Natasha Osben, 2026. "Aspiration and Wrongful Harm: Why the State Owes a Duty to Cultivate Hope," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 234-256, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:27:y:2026:i:2:p:234-256
    DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2025.2568521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19452829.2025.2568521
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19452829.2025.2568521?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:27:y:2026:i:2:p:234-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJHD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.