IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jhudca/v27y2026i2p192-216.html

Reimagining Heightened Human Rights Due Diligence: A Capability Approach Informed by Women’s Experiences in Wartime Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Tamara Horbachevska-Konstankevych
  • Olena Uvarova

Abstract

This article examines the limitations of existing Business and Human Rights (BHR) frameworks on the matter of addressing the complex ways war undermines women’s capabilities. The war in Ukraine serves as a stark illustration of how peacetime-oriented human rights due diligence processes are not able to grasp the multiple responsibility burdens placed on women comprehensively. This conceptual article addresses such deficiency by proposing to reinterpret BHR frameworks through the lens of the capability approach, conceptualizing war as a form of radical social change. By re-articulating the World Benchmarking Alliance Gender Benchmark through a capability lens, we develop a set of practical assessment points that shift the focus from merely avoiding harm to proactively enhancing women’s rights. Our primary contribution is a replicable methodology that can potentially equip businesses to conduct more meaningful, gender-responsive due diligence, ensuring that women’s rights and empowerment are central to corporate conduct during conflict and recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamara Horbachevska-Konstankevych & Olena Uvarova, 2026. "Reimagining Heightened Human Rights Due Diligence: A Capability Approach Informed by Women’s Experiences in Wartime Ukraine," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 192-216, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:27:y:2026:i:2:p:192-216
    DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2026.2615965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19452829.2026.2615965
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19452829.2026.2615965?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:27:y:2026:i:2:p:192-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJHD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.