IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jhudca/v26y2025i3p482-492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AI Can Revolutionise Education but Technology Is Not Enough: Human Development Meets Cultural Evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Muthukrishna
  • Jiner Dai
  • Diana Panizo Madrid
  • Riya Sabherwal
  • Karlijn Vanoppen
  • Hanying Yao

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence could dramatically boost educational outcomes and close gaps – but only if policymakers take a human-centred, systems-level approach to AI integration. Cultural evolution, the science of how beliefs, values, norms, technologies and institutions evolve over time, offers a framework for understanding the promises and pitfalls of different approaches to AI in education policy. Using this perspective and drawing on comparative evidence from Estonia’s successful “Tiger Leap” initiative and the failed “One Laptop Per Child” (OLPC) programme, we identify three missteps that derail national strategies: (1) techno-fix thinking, (2) weak infrastructure and teacher support and (3) lack of local adaptation. Uruguay’s Plan Ceibal is a notable exception to OLPC’s general failures, revealing why technology alone is not enough. We map AI’s headline promises – personalised tutoring, higher teacher productivity, smaller equity gaps – onto the specific capabilities each can expand, and we highlight three systemic risks: digital exclusion, algorithmic bias and widening inequalities. Synthesising these lessons, we propose a practical roadmap. AI will revolutionise education and enhance human development only insofar as it is embedded in human centred systems that grow everyone’s capabilities and freedom to learn, create and participate in society.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Muthukrishna & Jiner Dai & Diana Panizo Madrid & Riya Sabherwal & Karlijn Vanoppen & Hanying Yao, 2025. "AI Can Revolutionise Education but Technology Is Not Enough: Human Development Meets Cultural Evolution," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 482-492, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:26:y:2025:i:3:p:482-492
    DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2025.2517740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19452829.2025.2517740
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19452829.2025.2517740?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:26:y:2025:i:3:p:482-492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJHD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.