IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jhudca/v16y2015i1p33-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explicating the Capability Approach through the Voices of the Poor: A Case Study of Waste-picking Women in Kerala

Author

Listed:
  • Ann George

Abstract

The capability approach brings attention to individuals' freedom to choose the valued functionings of life as the parameter for assessing well-being. This study explicates the capability notion, which incorporates the question of what is of value for the subject, by examining how much some of the major concerns of development matter for the poor as revealed from their perceptions and pursuits. The study specifically examines how detested are some of the widely negatively valued situations (unfreedoms-their being disadvantaged in an unequal world and their being employed in lower-end jobs) and how valued are some of the widely positively valued functionings (freedoms-education for upward mobility) in the lives of the poor. The findings give a nuanced and multilayered understanding of the capability notion. It reveals how, with regard to negatively evaluated unfreedoms, the subject need not necessarily evaluate them negatively. This is not just because of adaptive preferences but also due to the fact that there is "multiplicity of functionings even within unfreedoms," some of which are positive and the subject might value them positively and even passionately. With regard to positively evaluated freedoms, the subject might not prioritize them in the gamut of other goals and pursuits.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann George, 2015. "Explicating the Capability Approach through the Voices of the Poor: A Case Study of Waste-picking Women in Kerala," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 33-46, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:16:y:2015:i:1:p:33-46
    DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2014.938728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19452829.2014.938728
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19452829.2014.938728?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:16:y:2015:i:1:p:33-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJHD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.