IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v69y2026i7p2134-2172.html

Opportunity costs of providing environmental services in mixed crop-livestock farming

Author

Listed:
  • Jean Joseph Minviel
  • Yawose Olivier Kudawoo
  • Timo Sipiläinen
  • M’hand Fares
  • Patrick Veysset

Abstract

Mixed crop-livestock farming is often presented as a lever to conciliate agricultural production and the provision of environmental services. This paper examines the opportunity cost of providing environmental services in mixed crop-livestock farming to investigate conditions under which the double objective is achievable. To do this, we develop an analytical framework to estimate production possibility frontiers, which includes both agricultural production and environmental services, while relaxing the traditional non-negativity assumption of the opportunity costs of environmental services. Using a French dataset, we find that the opportunity costs of environmental service indicators (biodiversity and carbon sequestration) are mostly negative. In addition, econometric estimations show that the share of grasslands, high labor intensity, labeling, and direct payments could increase the probability of having non-positive opportunity costs. These results suggest that although the double objective can be pursued voluntarily by farmers (non-positive opportunity costs), it is labor-intensive and can be enhanced through subsidization and labeling.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean Joseph Minviel & Yawose Olivier Kudawoo & Timo Sipiläinen & M’hand Fares & Patrick Veysset, 2026. "Opportunity costs of providing environmental services in mixed crop-livestock farming," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(7), pages 2134-2172, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:69:y:2026:i:7:p:2134-2172
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2025.2485973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2025.2485973
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2025.2485973?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:69:y:2026:i:7:p:2134-2172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.