IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v68y2025i12p2815-2837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unpacking firm political dependence: how administrative hierarchical distance affects corporate environmental information disclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Fang He
  • Xin Miao
  • Christina W.Y. Wong

Abstract

This article explores the diverse response strategies concerning environmental information disclosure (EID) among firms affiliated to different political hierarchies. Drawing on resource dependence theory (RDT), we hypothesize a U-shaped relationship between a firm’s administration hierarchical distance (AHD) and its EID. The relationship is also contingent on the scope of dependence, as reflected in two resource-based components: (i) firms with or without political connections, and (ii) varying levels of corporate innovation capability. Using data from Chinese listed companies in polluting industries, we document that firms with medium AHD have the weakest EID, while firms with shorter or longer AHD exhibit higher EID to maintain institutional or gain competitive resource, respectively. This pattern is stronger for non-politically connected and low-innovation firms. Our research not only enriches RDT on corporate political strategies by unpacking firm political dependency, but also contributes to the emerging work on the pluralistic perspective on government.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang He & Xin Miao & Christina W.Y. Wong, 2025. "Unpacking firm political dependence: how administrative hierarchical distance affects corporate environmental information disclosure," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(12), pages 2815-2837, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:68:y:2025:i:12:p:2815-2837
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2024.2325043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2024.2325043
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2024.2325043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:68:y:2025:i:12:p:2815-2837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.