IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v68y2025i11p2523-2544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder engagement in water resource management: a systematic review of definitions, practices, and outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Whitley
  • Elyzabeth W. Engle
  • Kathryn J. Brasier
  • Weston M. Eaton
  • Mark E. Burbach
  • Lara B. Fowler
  • Sara Bonilla Anariba
  • Emma Butzler
  • Kathryn Dixon
  • Anil Kumar Chaudhary
  • Walt Whitmer

Abstract

In the past three decades, a paradigm shift has elevated stakeholder engagement in natural resource governance, emphasizing collaborative approaches for effective decision-making. While academic literature increasingly endorses engagement methods, a gap persists in our knowledge of the methods and outcomes of such processes. To address this disparity, we systematically reviewed 261 peer-reviewed studies on stakeholder engagement in water resource management from 2000 to 2019. Analyses find that data-driven studies of engagement processes and outcomes from engagement processes are limited in the peer-reviewed literature. Our findings underscore the need for consistent vocabulary and theoretical frameworks and increased empirical evaluation to enhance our understanding of stakeholder engagement processes and outcomes in water resource management. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings and synthesizing the methods suggested by the general literature for creating more inclusive, replicable, and impactful engagement-related research and practice in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Whitley & Elyzabeth W. Engle & Kathryn J. Brasier & Weston M. Eaton & Mark E. Burbach & Lara B. Fowler & Sara Bonilla Anariba & Emma Butzler & Kathryn Dixon & Anil Kumar Chaudhary & Walt Whitme, 2025. "Stakeholder engagement in water resource management: a systematic review of definitions, practices, and outcomes," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(11), pages 2523-2544, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:68:y:2025:i:11:p:2523-2544
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2024.2323611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2024.2323611
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2024.2323611?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:68:y:2025:i:11:p:2523-2544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.