IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v68y2025i10p2321-2347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the low-carbon city pilot scheme enhance urban total environmental quality? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Zheneng Hu
  • Xiujuan Lan
  • Jianjiao Gong
  • Zhuoya Zhang
  • Chuanhao Wen

Abstract

China’s low-carbon city pilot scheme (LCCPS) supports a broad economic and social systemic transition. However, current analyses have only considered the unilateral impact of the LCCPS on the environment without assessing total environmental quality (TEQ). We employed a time-varying difference-in-difference model to detect the causal effect of the LCCPS on urban TEQ, using panel data extracted from satellite observations, including information on biodiversity, vegetation coverage, water resources, soil pollution, contamination pressure, and frequency of environmental pollution events. We found, first, that the scheme can ameliorate urban TEQ. Second, this effect is more obvious in cities in the eastern region, of high economic level, that are resource-dependent, and have a high industrial level. Finally, facilitating green technology innovation and raising public environmental awareness are crucial to achieve the scheme’s objectives. This study provides convincing evidence to support the promotion of the LCCPS in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheneng Hu & Xiujuan Lan & Jianjiao Gong & Zhuoya Zhang & Chuanhao Wen, 2025. "Does the low-carbon city pilot scheme enhance urban total environmental quality? Evidence from China," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(10), pages 2321-2347, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:68:y:2025:i:10:p:2321-2347
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2024.2312548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2024.2312548
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2024.2312548?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:68:y:2025:i:10:p:2321-2347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.