IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v67y2024i5p1034-1052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An assessment of the Ecological Conservation Redline: unlocking priority areas for conservation

Author

Listed:
  • Wenze Yue
  • Bi’ou Feng
  • Qiushi Zhou
  • Ronghua Xu
  • Mengmeng Li

Abstract

Protected areas (PAs) are established to conserve wildlife habitats and biodiversity. To this end, the Chinese central government has initiated a pioneering environmental planning and management policy known as the Ecological Conservation Redline (ECR). While the ecological benefits of ECR policy have been extensively evaluated, spatially explicit assessment of the ECR remains understudied. Here, we propose an element-function-structure framework for assessing the concurrence of ECR areas and ecological conservation hotspots to further outline priority areas for conservation. Results show that 67% of existing PAs are protected by ECR areas, while that of ecological corridors is only 11%. Regional variation in the ECR representativeness can be leveraged by deliberately protecting tailored ecological conservation hotspots in specific locations and stepping stones in ecological corridors. This study highlights the substantial space for ecological management to achieve the goals of ECR policy, and discourses on the co-production of knowledge from researchers and policy makers.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenze Yue & Bi’ou Feng & Qiushi Zhou & Ronghua Xu & Mengmeng Li, 2024. "An assessment of the Ecological Conservation Redline: unlocking priority areas for conservation," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(5), pages 1034-1052, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:67:y:2024:i:5:p:1034-1052
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2022.2145939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2022.2145939
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2022.2145939?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:67:y:2024:i:5:p:1034-1052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.