IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v67y2024i3p522-541.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptive capacity in the multi-level management system of migratory waterbirds: a case study of participatory goose management in Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Louise Eriksson
  • Maria Johansson
  • Johan Månsson
  • Camilla Sandström
  • Johan Elmberg

Abstract

Adaptive management (AM) is one approach to manage migratory waterbirds, but obstacles to the implementation of AM require adaptive capacities in the management system (rules, institutions, action situations). This study aims to examine the adaptive capacity of participatory goose management in Sweden. Considering the biophysical and institutional context, we analyzed how tangible, individual, and governance assets were associated with technical and social learning. Interviews with informants in the national council for geese, swans, and cranes, and local management groups (LMGs) were conducted, and documentation reviewed. Results revealed evidence of a local preparedness in areas with an LMG. Nevertheless, the study highlighted a need to formalize the evolving system, to consider a more systematic implementation of AM (including regulations allowing for adaptive responses), and to ensure stakeholder acceptance for management tools and visions. The study illustrates the need for a broad set of assets to ensure learning in participatory management.

Suggested Citation

  • Louise Eriksson & Maria Johansson & Johan Månsson & Camilla Sandström & Johan Elmberg, 2024. "Adaptive capacity in the multi-level management system of migratory waterbirds: a case study of participatory goose management in Sweden," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(3), pages 522-541, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:67:y:2024:i:3:p:522-541
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2022.2124153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2022.2124153
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2022.2124153?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:67:y:2024:i:3:p:522-541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.