IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v66y2023i14p2854-2877.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Principles and practical criteria for effective participatory environmental planning and decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • Jayne Carrick
  • Derek Bell
  • Clare Fitzsimmons
  • Tim Gray
  • Gavin Stewart

Abstract

Participation is increasingly used to legitimize and improve environmental decision making. However, in practice participants often find the process empty and frustrating. This has adverse consequences for environmental planning and consenting processes, where participants become disillusioned, and negative feelings develop into active opposition, causing delays, spiraling costs, and conflict. This paper addresses the gap between participatory ideals and unsatisfactory environmental decision-making in practice. We take a fresh look at how participatory ideals can be implemented and propose a new framework based on translating participatory ideals into practice. We identified commitments and values for fair and achievable participatory environmental decision-making from science and technology studies (STS), procedural environmental justice, and deliberative democracy. These were synthesized and organized into a set of principles (inclusivity, process-orientation, empowerment, and reflection) and then translated into “practical” criteria. The result is a new framework that links participatory ideals to practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Jayne Carrick & Derek Bell & Clare Fitzsimmons & Tim Gray & Gavin Stewart, 2023. "Principles and practical criteria for effective participatory environmental planning and decision-making," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(14), pages 2854-2877, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:66:y:2023:i:14:p:2854-2877
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2022.2086857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2022.2086857
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2022.2086857?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:66:y:2023:i:14:p:2854-2877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.