IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v65y2022i8p1436-1455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bank managers’ perceived importance of corporate environmental management in lending decisions: investigating institutional motivational factors

Author

Listed:
  • Junmei Qi
  • Edina Eberhardt-Toth
  • Elisabeth Paulet

Abstract

This study sheds light on the perception of corporate environmental management (CEM) in the lending business from the lenders’ perspective. The importance of the implementation of the CEM practices of borrowing companies indicated by bank managers is used to measure the bank managers’ perceptions of CEM in lending decisions. In addition, this paper examines the influence of institutional motivations – coercive, mimetic and normative – on the perception of CEM. A survey was conducted among 110 bank managers in France and Luxembourg in 2019. Through factor analysis and regression modeling, we found that banks’ CEM requirements for borrowing firms are mainly determined by pressure-type motivations, such as coercive and mimetic, rather than benefit-type motivations, such as financial and reputational. Our results offer new insights into how bank managers perceive the importance of CEM in lending decision-making and explain the perceptions that have been less studied in the existing literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Junmei Qi & Edina Eberhardt-Toth & Elisabeth Paulet, 2022. "Bank managers’ perceived importance of corporate environmental management in lending decisions: investigating institutional motivational factors," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(8), pages 1436-1455, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:65:y:2022:i:8:p:1436-1455
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2021.1931824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2021.1931824
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2021.1931824?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:65:y:2022:i:8:p:1436-1455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.