IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v65y2022i14p2719-2747.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why do public sectors perform high-level green public procurement practice? A new insight with fsQCA approach

Author

Listed:
  • Meng Ye
  • Yanlin Ma
  • Junqi Liu

Abstract

Despite extensive studies on drivers for public sector’s green public procurement (GPP) practice, existing studies have not yet introduced configuration analysis based on holistic perspective into this field. This study, based on the Chinese background, focuses on the public sector and develops a conceptual model from a holistic perspective. Survey data are collected and we adopt the fsQCA approach for further testing, aiming to explore which combinations of GPP motivators can induce high-level GPP practice by public sectors. It is found that five configurations can induce high-level GPP practice. According to the core condition, these configurations can be further categorized as two groups: “top management support-dominated” and “non-top management support-dominated”. The holistic perspective contributes to a better understanding for GPP practice and a new explanation for the conflicted conclusions of existing studies. The managerial and policy implications are also helpful to public sector managers and policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Meng Ye & Yanlin Ma & Junqi Liu, 2022. "Why do public sectors perform high-level green public procurement practice? A new insight with fsQCA approach," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(14), pages 2719-2747, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:65:y:2022:i:14:p:2719-2747
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2021.1978060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2021.1978060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2021.1978060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:65:y:2022:i:14:p:2719-2747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.