IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v63y2020i14p2646-2662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modified landscapes: visitor’s perceptions of conservation in a natural reserve invaded by exotic conifers

Author

Listed:
  • Clara Pissolito
  • Sebastian Dario Rossi
  • Jorgelina Franzese
  • Estela Raffaele
  • María Emilia Fernández

Abstract

Biological invasions are considered a major problem for nature conservation globally. Natural resource managers make immense efforts to control invasions. However, many management strategies depend on public support. In this study, we assessed how recreational users perceive the conservation level of a protected area where the native forest has been altered by the introduction of the fire-adapted Pinus radiata, wildfires and the resulting invasion. We also analyzed how users’ definition of exotic species related to their perceptions and support for management actions. We found that 75% of respondents perceived the area to be well conserved, although 76% provided the correct definition for exotic species. Local, overnight and exotic-species knowledgeable users perceived the area’s conservation level to be lower than their counterparts. Also, local and knowledgeable people reported more support for management strategies. We interpret that the public’s positive perception of a heavily invaded landscape can be linked to bio-cultural homogenization.

Suggested Citation

  • Clara Pissolito & Sebastian Dario Rossi & Jorgelina Franzese & Estela Raffaele & María Emilia Fernández, 2020. "Modified landscapes: visitor’s perceptions of conservation in a natural reserve invaded by exotic conifers," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(14), pages 2646-2662, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:63:y:2020:i:14:p:2646-2662
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2020.1742676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2020.1742676
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2020.1742676?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:63:y:2020:i:14:p:2646-2662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.